1)
My
outside-school experiences have not expanded or deepened my subject area
content knowledge. This is one problem I
have with the way I was taught math in school.
Math was never presented to me in a practical way or in any way relevant
to my life, so what I learned about math content was only school-based and I
never looked for it or connected it to my life outside of school. This is something I still struggle with as it
is so engrained in my mathematical foundation.
2)
My
initial thoughts about the Ball article “The Subject Matter Preparation of
Teachers” have not changed based on our class discussion. For the most part, I think that many of the
teachers in the class agreed that knowledge of subject matter is important, but
not the only component or main component of teaching. A teacher that does not have classroom
management skills or pedagogical skills will not be an effective teacher, no
matter how much content knowledge they have about a certain subject. As it is said, “with practice comes
excellence.” Well, a teacher with a lot
of practice may not be excellent, but he/she should have gathered a vast amount of tools to be an effective
teacher.
In my opinion, the point of an educator (especially
in elementary school) is to give children the opportunity to learn information,
develop a love for learning, and foster a sense of community and support in the
classroom; any teacher with pedagogical content knowledge, hands-on practice,
and a passion to teach children should be able to be an effective teacher, no
matter if they had extensive college and post-baccalaureate exposure to their
subject or not. I believe that passing
the CSET coupled with the preparation in a credential program gives enough
content knowledge for educators to start in their field.
If a teacher has to teach something that they do not
remember or do not have strong background knowledge in, he/she can brush up on
the topic with the help of colleagues, books, or the internet. NO teacher is going to know EVERYTHING about
their subject matter. As long as they
have a solid foundation, the details and extension of content knowledge can be
added in later – pedagogy is what needs to be stressed in teacher preparation
programs.
3)
Yesterday
I met with an old professor of mine, Jenny Maguire, who was my Mathematics:
Curriculum and Instruction in the credential program. She is one of my all-time favorite teachers –
one who perfectly represents Shulman’s “pedagogical content knowledge” and
Saint Mary’s constructivist approach.
She is extremely intelligent and knowledgeable in the field of math, so
I thought she could be a great resource for me as I narrow my focus for my
research. I told her all of the areas I
wanted to look into – math phobia, math-gender stereotypes, inequity in
mathematics, representation of different cultures in the field of math,
strategies to be an effective math teacher, etc. – and she helped me narrow my
focus so that I could become an expert in a particular area and possibly make a
REAL contribution to the field of mathematics and to teaching in general. I want to charter in untraveled waters, not
just restate what has already been done.
I decided I am going to look into how to give access
(both mental and physical) to underrepresented types of learners, cultures, and
women in math. I want to look into “relatability”
in math and how to promote positive math relationships, not just positive math
attitudes. I want children to
engage and have a relationship with the math, so my goal is to come up with a
small handful of strategies that teachers can use to accomplish this. She also gave me a couple of ideas for
experiential sources for my research that I am going to check out – namely, the
Lawrence Hall of Science in Berkeley and the Exploratorium in SF. She said that both have fun, hands-on math
activities to engage children. I am very
excited about the development of my research!
(Meg, I responded to Betsy Varellas getmovingintheclassroom.blogspot.com, Alex Iwaszewicz aiwaszewicz.blogspot.com, and Jocelyn Rohan Brodeur jocelynrohan.blogspot.com)
(Meg, I responded to Betsy Varellas getmovingintheclassroom.blogspot.com, Alex Iwaszewicz aiwaszewicz.blogspot.com, and Jocelyn Rohan Brodeur jocelynrohan.blogspot.com)
I agree with what you said that is very hard for a teacher to know everything about their subject area. An effective teacher will do everything in their power to constantly expand his/her knowledge.
ReplyDeleteWhen you stated that your research will look at how to "promote positive math relationships, not just positive math attitudes," what specifically do you mean by a 'math relationship'? I understand how a student's attitude towards math can be either positive, negative or neutral. Could you please clarify what a positive relationship with math would look like?
I am excited to follow your progress! :)
Chris,
ReplyDeleteI agree with what you say about the Ball article. I think that a teacher who truly want to be effective in the class will have these classroom management skills as well as the pedagogical skills. I too believe that all the requirements that there are in order to become a multiple subject teacher gives you an understanding of enough content knowledge to become an effective teacher. I think that knowing who your students are is one of the most important things when thinking of being an effective teacher.
I love the sound of our capstone project! I was a student who didn't have teachers who taught math in a way that I could relate my real life to, it was just something we did in school. I think that you have a great start to your research and look forward to hearing about it as you keep going.
I agree that content knowledge is important but not the only thing that is important-not by far. I spent my second student teaching placement as well as all my time subbing at a Title One school in Alameda which was known for having a challenging student population. Unfortunately, I witnessed firsthand the chaos and lack of learning which stemmed from a teacher's lack of classroom management and pedagogical knowledge. I also agree that pedagogy is what needs to be emphasized in a teaching credential program. High school and college installs a foundation in content knowledge that can be add to throughout life; a credential program is probably the first and possibly the only (but hopefully not!) exposure to pedagogy a potential teacher will receive.
ReplyDeleteChristina,
ReplyDeleteI think that it is just wonderful that your researching this and it really holds a special place in my heart because math was always such a struggle for me and I don't want my students to feel the same way about math that I did. I can't wait to read what your research finds to help promote positive attitudes toward math!
I couldn't agree more with you when you said that not every teacher has to know everything about their subject matter but just a solid foundation and the importance of pedagogy in teacher preparation programs.
Good luck in your research!